I necessitate one of these , pronto . I can take either the 12 - in 1,280 x 800 - pixel Wacom Cintiq 12WX or the 20 - inch Wacom Cintiq 20WSX , with it ’s glorious 1,680 x 1,050 pixels . Sure heavy is always good , as Russ Meyer would have agree , but even the smaller poser will reserve me to rush up my cheapo Photochops by a broker of a lot . Or at least that ’s what I suppose , because Wacom does n’t allow me to exam - motor one for the Giz . Too unfit , because the eyeglasses look fresh :
QUICK FACTS – CINTIQ 20WSX
Overall property : 21.6″W x 14.5″H x 1.8″D without stand
Display Area : 17″W x 10.7″H
Screen Size : 20.1″ diagonal
Native Resolution WSXGA+ ( 1680 x 1050 )
Weight : 16.3 lbs without stand
20.0 pound with stand
Aspect Ratio : 16:10
Pressure Levels : 1,024 on penitentiary tip and eraser
Stand Adjustability : 10 ° to 65 ° incline
gyration : + /- 180 °
guarantee : 2 years
QUICK FACTS – CINTIQ 12WX
Overall Dimensions : 16″ W x 10.5″ H x .67″ D
Display Area : 10.3″ W x 6.4″ H
Screen Size : 12.1″ sloped
Native Resolution WXGA ( 1280 x 800 )
Weight : 4.4 lbs with video control condition building block
Stand Adjustability : Flat on background , 25 ° to 60 °
gyration : 360 ° flat position on pivot
Unlike the cost . $ 1,999 for the 20 - in model and $ 999 for the 12 - inch puts this out of most of digital creative person aficionados . For professionals , however , they will yield themselves in no time . However , I ’m singular about what normal users could do with this . [ WacomviaMacNN ]
Gawker Media polls take Javascript ; if you ’re view this in an RSS reader , penetrate through to view in your Javascript - enabled web web internet browser .
Daily Newsletter
Get the good technical school , science , and culture intelligence in your inbox daily .
news program from the future , delivered to your present tense .
